For twelve hundred years the monks held the ink and the Mergeners held the oar. Then the abbey was gone. This is the story of the generation that grew up after it: of Matthias Mergener, born in 1816, who lost the world his ancestors had known but gained something none of them had, the ability to read. It carried his family across an ocean.

How to read this article

This piece weaves four Mergener Archive notes into one story, told in order:

It is the third in a series, after The Land and the Name (how the surname was born) and The Abbey's Balance Sheet (how the abbey's wealth was built and sold). "Key idea" boxes carry the main teaching points; "What the records say" boxes show where facts need checking.

Key takeaways

Timeline at a glance

YearThe wider worldThe Mergener family
1794French armies occupy the RhinelandAbbey property placed under French control
1797Scharzhof auctioned to Johann Jakob KochThe abbey loses its crown-jewel vineyard
1802St. Mergen dissolved; lands sold as national propertyMonastic landlord and safety net disappear
1815Congress of Vienna gives the Rhineland to PrussiaPrussian schools, taxes and laws arrive
1816Matthias Mergener born in Wasserliesch
1818Karl Marx born in Trier (5 May)
c. 1822–30Village Volksschule under Prussian ruleMatthias of school age
1838Heinrich Marx dies (10 May)
1839Matthias marries Barbara Kohn (December)
1841Nicholas born (6 December)
1842–43Karl Marx writes on wood theft and the Moselle winegrowersMaria born (1843)
1845–47Potato blight; "Hungry Forties"Anna Maria born (1845)
1848Revolutions across Germany; Communist ManifestoMatthis born
1850Peter born; Barbara Kohn dies
1852Johann born to Matthias and Elisabeth Kronenbusch
1853Vine disease (oidium), crop failures, rising taxesThe family emigrates to America
1867Marx publishes Capital, Volume I
1918Nicholas Mergener dies in America

Part 1 · The old balanceThe Ink and the Oar: 1,200 Years of Practical Wisdom

For more than a millennium, from the end of Roman rule through the Middle Ages and into the eighteenth century, the land around the Abbey of St. Mergen was divided by a line of knowledge.

On one side, inside the stone walls of St. Maria ad Martyres, were the monks: fluent in Latin, copying and illuminating manuscripts, keeping land registers (Urbare) and writing letters to archbishops and emperors. On the other side were the valley people, the tenant farmers, vineyard workers, coopers and boatmen known as Mergener. They spoke the local Moselle Franconian dialect and, almost without exception, had no formal schooling.

Business records without writing

It would be a mistake to call them uneducated. They managed a complicated river economy with their own practical systems of accounting and administration:

An apprenticeship in the river valley

A Mergener's schooling was hands-on and demanding. Life on the narrow strip between river and cliff called for real technical mastery:

Key idea: two kinds of knowledge, one system

For 1,200 years the arrangement held: the monks held the ink, and the Mergeners held the oar. Neither could run the valley alone. The abbey needed skilled hands; the families needed the abbey's written titles, legal protection and stores. The system worked as long as the abbey existed. Parts 2 and 3 show what happened when it didn't.

Part 2 · The rupture1802: When the Purpose Was Gone

In 1802, under Napoleon (then First Consul), the French state suppressed the monasteries of the annexed Rhineland. St. Mergen was dissolved, its monks sent away and its lands declared biens nationaux, national property. Forests, fields and vineyards were auctioned to the highest bidders: speculators, town merchants and the rising middle class. (For the full story of the sale see The Abbey's Balance Sheet.)

Contemporaries praised secularization as a victory of Enlightenment reason. For the abbey's tenants, it quietly took away almost everything that had given their lives structure:

Key idea: losing a purpose, not just a landlord

The family's name had been a job description for three centuries. With the abbey gone, the Mergeners kept the name but lost the connection that had given it meaning. Every generation after 1802 had to find a new answer to the question their ancestors never had to ask: what do we do now?

Part 3 · Matthias's worldDaily Life in Wasserliesch, 1816–1853

Matthias Mergener (also written Mathias) was born in 1816 in Wasserliesch, a wine village on the Moselle near Konz, a few miles upriver from Trier. His family had lived there since the upheavals of the late 1600s drove abbey tenants out of the Trier plain. He belonged to the first generation to grow up with no memory of the abbey at all.

1. Limestone, not slate: the Upper Moselle exception

The famous Moselle of steep slate slopes and Riesling lies downstream of Trier. Wasserliesch lies on the Upper Moselle (Obermosel), where the rock changes from slate to shell limestone (Muschelkalk). Different soil meant different farming.

2. A farm cut into ribbons

A medieval tenant might have worked a full Hufe, about 30 acres, enough for a family. By Matthias's time that was a memory. Land in the Moselle valley was divided equally among all children at each generation (Realteilung, partible inheritance). After a few generations a "farm" was a patchwork:

What the records say: who caused the fragmentation?

The earlier note blames Napoleon's inheritance law. In fact equal division among heirs was a long-standing custom along the Moselle and in much of south-west Germany well before 1800. The French Code civil, which stayed in force in the Rhineland after 1815, made equal shares a legal right and reinforced the pattern. So both custom and French law played a part.

3. Working the Scharzhofberg for wages

Did Mergeners work on the famous Scharzhofberg, the abbey's old crown jewel? It is very likely. As the crow flies the vineyard, just outside Wiltingen in the Saar valley, is only about 7 km (4–5 miles) southeast of Wasserliesch. Before railways, day-labourers routinely walked one to two hours each way for harvest work or clearing shifts in the next valley.

When private estates like Scharzhof expanded their fine Riesling production in the nineteenth century, they relied on seasonal workers from villages like Wasserliesch. The work was brutal:

Then they walked home to their own small Elbling strips.

Key idea: the full circle

Eight centuries earlier, the Scharzhofberg had been abbey land, worked by the abbey's own people. By the 1840s, the descendants of those people came back as hired hands, paid by the day, on slopes that now belonged to a private family. The same hillside, the same kind of work, but a completely different relationship to the land.

What the records say: correcting the Scharzhof buyer

The Wasserliesch note says Scharzhof was bought "in 1804 by Gisbert Koch." The French auction records show the buyer was Johann Jakob (Jacques) Koch, the abbey's prior, and the sale was in July 1797 (Lars Carlberg). The estate later passed through his daughter Elisabeth and her husband Felix Müller to the Egon Müller family, who own it today.

4. The family of Matthias Mergener

In December 1839 Matthias married Barbara Kohn (1813–1850). Over the next decade they had five children, and after Barbara's death Matthias had a sixth child with his second wife, Elisabeth Kronenbusch:

ChildBornMother
Nicholas "Nick"6 Dec 1841 (d. 1918)Barbara Kohn
Maria1843Barbara Kohn
Anna Maria1845Barbara Kohn
Matthis1848Barbara Kohn
Peter1850Barbara Kohn
Johann1852Elisabeth Kronenbusch

The 1840s squeezed the family from every side. The potato blight (1845–47) opened the "Hungry Forties." Then in 1850, shortly after Peter was born, Barbara died, leaving Matthias a widower with five young children. Without the abbey, without enough land, and now without his wife, he faced the choice that confronted thousands of Moselle families: sink into landless poverty, or leave.

Part 4 · The Moselle ParadoxHeinrich Marx, Karl Marx and the Mergeners

A few miles downriver in Trier, the same upheaval was shaping a very different family. The Mergener Archive calls it the Moselle Paradox: the dissolution of the abbeys created comfortable careers for some and ruin for others, and it helped produce one of the most influential thinkers in history.

1. The lawyer: Heinrich Marx

Heinrich Marx (born Heschel Marx) was a successful Trier lawyer, trained in French civil law during the Napoleonic years. When Prussia took over the Rhineland, Jews were barred from state legal offices, and around 1817 Heinrich converted to Protestantism in order to keep practising. His son Karl was born in Trier on 5 May 1818.

Heinrich, later given the honorary title Justizrat, made his living inside the new legal order that secularization had created. The work of a Trier lawyer in these decades included:

He was an Enlightenment liberal who saw these changes as progress: rational law, secure property and a path to middle-class respectability.

What the records say: Heinrich Marx and St. Mergen

The earlier note says Heinrich Marx was "pivotal in processing" the privatization of monastic land. It is accurate that his profession lived on the new property order. No document has yet been found showing that he handled St. Mergen's land specifically. Treat the link as the setting he worked in, not a proven transaction. A search of Trier notarial and court records for his name alongside abbey properties could settle it.

2. The critic: Karl Marx

Heinrich hoped Karl would become a respected jurist. His letters, written before his death on 10 May 1838, fret over his son's spending, his late-night philosophy and his neglect of practical law. Karl went his own way.

In 1842 Karl became editor of the Cologne newspaper Rheinische Zeitung. Two of his first major pieces dealt with the world the Mergeners lived in:

Years later, Marx wrote that these debates over wood theft and the condition of the Moselle peasantry were what first forced him to study economics (preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, 1859).

3. From wood theft to Capital

In 1867 Marx published Volume I of Capital (Das Kapital). In the section on "primitive accumulation," the chapter "The Expropriation of the Agricultural Population from the Land" argues that capitalism began by separating peasants from the land by force and law:

"The spoliation of the church's property, the fraudulent alienation of the State domains, the robbery of the common lands … were just so many idyllic methods of primitive accumulation." — Karl Marx, Capital, Vol. I

The process he describes matches what happened on the Moselle. Church estates were sold, customary rights were criminalised, and people who could no longer live on their land had to sell their labour by the day or leave.

What the records say: how far to take the connection

Marx's case studies in Capital are drawn mainly from England (the Tudor sale of monastery lands, enclosures, the Scottish clearances), not from the Moselle. It is well documented that the Moselle was where his interest in economics began. The claim that he wrote Capital "about families like the Mergeners" is a fair interpretation of that link, but Marx never mentions St. Mergen or Wasserliesch.

Heinrich MarxKarl MarxMatthias Mergener
RoleLawyer (Justizrat)Journalist, philosopherSmallholder, day-labourer
Saw 1802 asProgress: rational law and secure propertyLegalised dispossessionThe loss of protection and purpose
ResponseWorked within the new property systemAnalysed and attacked itLeft it: emigrated in 1853
LegacyAn educated middle-class familyA world-changing political philosophyA living family line in America

Part 5 · The unexpected giftThe Prussian Shift: Compulsory Schooling

The same Prussian state that taxed the Moselle smallholders and enforced the new property laws also brought something the Mergeners had never had: schools for every child.

1. Schulpflicht comes to the Moselle

After Napoleon's defeat, the Congress of Vienna (1815) gave the Rhineland to the Kingdom of Prussia. Prussia already had one of Europe's most developed systems of compulsory elementary schooling (Schulpflicht), and in the following years it extended it to its new Rhine Province. Village children were required to attend the local Volksschule, usually a one-room school run with the parish, from about age six to fourteen.

Matthias, born in 1816, would have been of school age from about 1822 to 1830. That places him among the first generation of rural Rhinelanders required by law to go to school. For the first time in the family's twelve centuries along the Moselle, a Mergener could hold the ink as well as the oar.

2. What a village school taught

The curriculum was practical and strict:

By the time Nicholas was born in 1841 the system was well established. Growing up in the 1840s and 1850s, he received a standardised elementary education in which reading, writing and arithmetic were basic expectations, not privileges.

Key idea: an unexpected gift

Prussia did not build village schools out of kindness to smallholders. It wanted loyal, disciplined, useful subjects: soldiers who could read orders, taxpayers who could read notices. But the skill it gave them could be used for purposes the state never intended, including reading an emigration contract and leaving Prussia for good. Of all the changes after 1802, this was the one that gave the Mergeners a way out.

What the records say: testing Matthias's literacy

There is a simple way to check this. Look at Matthias and Barbara's 1839 marriage record, the baptism records of the children and any 1853 emigration documents in the Landeshauptarchiv Koblenz. Did Matthias sign his name, or make a mark (an "X")? Historians use signatures on marriage registers as a standard measure of literacy, and a signature would be direct evidence for this chapter.

Part 6 · 1853Literacy as a Survival Tool: The Journey to America

1. The last straw

The early 1850s brought new disaster to the Moselle vineyards: oidium, powdery mildew, a vine disease newly arrived in Europe that destroyed grape crops. It came on top of poor harvests, rising taxes and the loss of Barbara. In 1853 Matthias and Elisabeth decided to go, with six children, all under fifteen, on a journey of some 6,000 miles to America.

2. How reading protected the family

For Matthias and his eldest son Nicholas, literacy made the difference at three critical points:

  1. Getting through the paperwork. Before leaving, Matthias had to obtain a Prussian Entlassungsurkunde (a certificate releasing him from Prussian citizenship), tax clearances and travel papers for the family. Emigrants who could not read were at the mercy of officials and middlemen, and some were turned back at borders.
  2. Reading the fine print. Emigration agents (Auswanderungsagenten) and port touts were notorious for selling tickets on unseaworthy ships, overpriced passages and fake American land grants. Matthias could read a steerage contract and check what it promised in food, baggage and berth before handing over the family's savings.
  3. Finding the way. From Moselle and Rhine riverboats to railway timetables and the ports, the journey was a maze of notices, warning signs, passenger lists and emigrant guidebooks. Matthias could read them.

3. Nicholas: the bridge between two worlds

Nicholas was about eleven or twelve when they left (he turned twelve in December 1853). He was old enough to remember Trier's stone walls and young enough to adapt quickly. During the crossing, roughly forty days in a wooden sailing ship, his father had him practise with slate and chalk. With a solid grounding in German script, Nicholas learned English quickly after they reached the American Midwest, and became the family's translator, contract reader and guide as they built a new life.

4. The route

According to family tradition the journey ran:

  1. Wasserliesch, by riverboat down the Moselle and Rhine to a seaport.
  2. The Atlantic, about forty days under sail.
  3. The Erie Canal, from the Hudson across New York State to Lake Erie.
  4. The Great Lakes, west by steamer.
  5. About 200 miles overland through unbroken forest to their new land.

What the records say: details to confirm

Part 7 · Two answers to one crisisKarl Marx and Matthias Mergener

Karl Marx and Matthias Mergener were born two years and a few miles apart. Both grew up in the aftermath of the same event, the dissolution of the Trier abbeys and the new property order that followed, and both answered it.

In Capital, the dispossessed peasant often appears as a victim of forces too large to resist. The Mergener story adds a human counterpoint. A man with a little schooling, a lot of determination and six children in tow took the one path the system left open, and made it work.

Key idea: the resolution of the long story

While Karl Marx analysed the loss of the abbey world, Matthias Mergener built the future that outlasted it.

ConclusionFrom the Oar to the Pen

  1. Before 1802: the monks keep the written records; the Mergeners keep the vineyards, barrels and boats, with tally sticks, house marks and memory.
  2. 1802: St. Mergen is dissolved; the family loses its landlord, safety net and purpose.
  3. 1815–1830: Prussia arrives and sends Matthias's generation to school.
  4. 1839–1850: Matthias raises a family on one or two acres and day wages; blight and bereavement close in.
  5. 1842–43: in Trier, Karl Marx begins writing about people in exactly this situation.
  6. 1853: literacy lets Matthias steer his family through bureaucracy, fraud and a 6,000-mile journey.
  7. America: Nicholas, schooled in German script, becomes the family's voice in English.

The abbey had given the Mergeners their name. Prussia, without intending to, gave them the means to take it somewhere new.

ReferenceGlossary

Kerbholz (tally stick)
A notched stick split in two so that both parties held matching records of a debt.
Hausmarke (house mark)
A family's geometric sign, used on stones, barrels and tools in place of a written name.
Schöffe
A lay juror and village elder who remembered boundaries and customary law.
Urbar
A register of a lordship's lands, tenants and dues.
Obermosel
The Upper Moselle above Trier, with limestone rather than slate soils.
Muschelkalk
Shell limestone, the rock of the Upper Moselle vineyards.
Elbling
An ancient, high-yielding white grape suited to limestone.
Bütte
A wicker or wooden backpack basket for grapes, soil or slate.
Tagelöhner
A day-labourer, paid by the day.
Realteilung
Partible inheritance: land split equally among all heirs.
Hufe
The medieval family farm, about 30 acres.
Oidium
Powdery mildew, a vine disease that reached European vineyards around 1850.
Schulpflicht
Compulsory school attendance.
Volksschule
The village elementary school.
Fraktur
The German blackletter typeface used in print.
Kurrent
Traditional German handwriting.
Justizrat
An honorary title for senior lawyers in Prussia.
Entlassungsurkunde
Certificate of release from Prussian citizenship, required to emigrate lawfully.
Auswanderungsagent
An emigration agent who sold passages and arranged travel.
Primitive accumulation
Marx's term for the historical separation of producers from their land and means of living.

ReferenceFrequently Asked Questions

Who was Matthias Mergener?

Matthias (also spelled Mathias) Mergener was born in 1816 in Wasserliesch on the Upper Moselle. A smallholder and day-labourer, he married Barbara Kohn in 1839 and, after her death in 1850, Elisabeth Kronenbusch. In 1853 he emigrated to America with six children, including his eldest son Nicholas (1841–1918).

What was life like in Wasserliesch around 1850?

Families worked one or two acres split into narrow strips, growing potatoes, rye and spelt for food and Elbling grapes on the limestone slopes for cash. Men worked as day-labourers, including seasonal work on estates such as the Scharzhofberg about 7 km away. The potato blight of 1845–1847 brought hunger.

How did the dissolution of St. Mergen affect the Mergeners?

The abbey had been landlord, employer, lender of grain in bad years and source of customary rights such as gathering wood. After 1802 its land went to private buyers, those protections ended, and the tenant families lost both their livelihood and their institutional purpose.

What is the Moselle Paradox?

The Mergener Archive's name for how the same upheaval produced different lives in and around Trier: the lawyer Heinrich Marx prospered in the new property-law system, his son Karl Marx became its most famous critic after writing about Moselle winegrowers in 1842–43, and smallholders like the Mergeners were squeezed until they emigrated.

Why was Prussian schooling important to the Mergener family?

After 1815 Prussia required village children to attend elementary school, teaching reading, German script and arithmetic. Matthias was among the first generation schooled this way. In 1853 literacy let him handle emigration papers, check ship contracts against fraud and navigate the journey, and let his son Nicholas learn English quickly in America.

When and why did the Mergeners emigrate?

In 1853, after vine disease (oidium), crop failures, rising taxes and the death of Matthias's first wife, the family left Wasserliesch. They crossed the Atlantic and travelled via the Erie Canal and the Great Lakes to the American Midwest.

ReferenceSources and Further Reading

The four Mergener Archive notes combined here

  1. (note) Daily Life in Wasserliesch 1850
  2. (note) Education vs Practical Wisdom at St. Mergen – Part 1
  3. (note) The Prussian Shift: Literacy as a Survival Tool – Part 2
  4. (note) The Moselle Paradox: Marx and Mergener

Companion articles in this series

Outside sources

Archives for primary records

Open research questions

© Mergener Archive. All rights reserved. This article consolidates four earlier notes and updates them with published research where noted.